posted byAmarachukwu Abigail
December 19, 2024

"Sending money to your extended family back home is a common African practice I hate. I will never participate in it" - US-based media personality, Elsa Majimbo.

share

"Sending money to your extended family back home is a common African practice I hate. I will never participate in it" - US-based media personality, Elsa Majimbo.

"Sending money to your extended family back home is a common African practice I hate. I will never participate in it" - US-based media personality, Elsa Majimbo.


Elsa Majimbo, a US-based media personality, recently sparked controversy with her statement on social media, declaring her disdain for the common African practice of sending money to extended family back home. Her bold declaration has ignited a heated debate, with some supporting her stance and others criticizing her for abandoning her cultural heritage. In this article, we'll delve into the complexities surrounding this practice and explore the arguments for and against it.


In many African cultures, supporting extended family is a deeply ingrained tradition and sign of respect. It's a way to show love and care for relatives, particularly those in need. This practice is often seen as a moral obligation, with individuals feeling a sense of responsibility to help their family members.


The practice of sending money to extended family has its roots in African culture and history. In traditional African societies, family ties were strong, and relatives relied on each other for support and survival. With urbanization and migration, this practice has continued, with individuals sending money back home to support their loved ones.


Elsa Majimbo's stance against sending money to extended family is rooted in her desire for financial independence and autonomy. She argues that this practice can create dependency and hinder relatives' motivation to work or improve their circumstances. Additionally, she believes that individuals should prioritize their own financial goals and needs over familial obligations.


One of the primary concerns with sending money to extended family is that it can create dependency. When individuals receive constant financial support, they may become reliant on this support and lack the incentive to seek employment or improve their economic situation.


Sending money to extended family can also hinder personal financial growth. When individuals prioritize familial obligations over their own financial goals, they may miss out on opportunities for investment, savings, and wealth creation.


On the other hand, supporters of this practice argue that it's a necessary aspect of cultural heritage and familial ties. They believe that sending money to extended family demonstrates love, care, and commitment to one's cultural values.


Relatives may genuinely need financial assistance due to poverty, unemployment, or other challenges. Sending money to extended family can provide essential support, helping relatives to meet their basic needs and improve their economic situation.


Sending money to extended family can also strengthen family bonds and demonstrate love and care from a distance. This practice can bring families closer together, even when separated by distance.


While Elsa Majimbo's stance has sparked controversy, it's essential to consider individual circumstances and contexts. What works for one person may not work for another, and open communication is key to navigating these complexities.


Elsa's decision might be influenced by her personal experiences, financial situation, and relationships with her extended family. This acknowledges that individual contexts play a significant role in shaping opinions and decisions.


The importance of supporting extended family varies across African cultures and communities. This perspective recognizes the diversity of cultural practices and values, highlighting the need to understand and respect these nuances.


Relatives should discuss expectations, boundaries, and financial situations to find a balance that respects both personal autonomy and familial responsibilities. Open communication can help navigate the complexities surrounding this practice.


The debate surrounding Elsa Majimbo's stance on sending money to extended family highlights the complexities and nuances involved. While some argue that financial independence and autonomy are essential, others emphasize the importance of cultural obligation, financial support, and family ties. Ultimately, the decision to send money to extended family depends on individual circumstances, cultural context, and personal values. By engaging in open and honest discussions, we can work towards finding a balance that respects both personal autonomy and familial responsibilities.

Powered by Froala Editor